Lean Portfolio Management (LPM), Solution Management, Product Management, Product Triad
Scaling Structures, Scaling the Product Owner
Sprint Alignment, Communication and Coordination, Decision-Making, Prioritization, Resource Allocation, Dependencies, Stakeholder Engagement, Performance Monitoring, Organizational Structure,
This pattern can address two key challenges:
A MetaScrum group is a group of leaders and stakeholders for a product, product group (portfolio), or value stream who meet with product owners to guide the strategic direction of a product. Leadership and stakeholders are selected based on their interest in the success of the product or product group (portfolio), as well as the knowledge of the target audience the product, product group (portfolio) benefits.
MetaScrum has two meanings:
A specific type of MetaScrum is the Executive MetaScrum, which brings together a dynamic group of senior leadership in the organization to guide organization strategy, as well as set priorities for one or more product groups (portfolios) in an organization. Typical membership includes individuals involved in product marketing, sales and distribution, and C-levels (e.g., “CEO”,”CIO”,”COO”,”CTO” or similar) in addition to product owner(s).
In SAFe, the participants in Lean Portfolio Management, function much like an Executive MetaScrum, working with Epic Owners and Business Owners to guide the direction of a portfolio of products.
In Scrum@Scale, the MetaScrum aligns product ownership, leadership, and stakeholders for better scaling and decision-making across multiple agile teams. This pattern can also be implemented to form an Executive MetaScrum comprising executives and product or portfolio owners.
MetaScrum, MetaScrum (Group), SAFe, Scrum@Scale
A MetaScrum group is best to implement when the individuals needed to successfully guide a product, product group (portfolio), or value stream are numerous (more than a couple) and there is a need to gain consensus on the direction of a product, product group (portfolio), or value stream on a regular and consistent basis.
A MetaScrum group also gives legitimacy to the decisions made about the product, product group (portfolio), or value stream through the recognized knowledge and influence of the participants.
When the decisions regarding a product, product group (portfolio), or value stream can be made effectively without input from stakeholders and leaders.
In addition, when decisions can be obtained on an organic, ad hoc basis, it is better to NOT have a MetaScrum group.
By leveraging the group to make decisions and come to a consensus (as applicable), you are more likely to make better, information informed decisions, as more viewpoints are considered.
Time to gather the group and arrive at a decision will be longer than if one person could make the same decision. In extreme cases this could lead to lost opportunity.
Sources
1. (Scrum Patterns Group MetaScrum) Sutherland, Jeff, Coplien, James O., and The Scrum Patterns Group. A Scrum Book: The Spirit of the Game. Pragmatic Bookshelf. 2019.